As grocery store prices rise, consumers open to experimentation opt for animal meat over more expensive plant-based versions
As grocery store prices rise, consumers open to experimentation opt for animal meat over more expensive plant-based versions


In a survey of more than 1,200 US adults, Purdue University found that consumers largely preferred beef from cattle over alternatives for taste, appearance, freshness, price, convenience, and several other factors.
A majority of consumers (71%) said beef from cattle is much or somewhat better in taste, while only 17% said that beef and beef alternatives tasted about the same, and 12% said the alternatives were better. Similarly, 57% of consumers said beef is much or somewhat better in terms of freshness, while 27% said it was about the same for the two, and 16% said meat alternatives were much or somewhat fresher.
While animal-based meats beat meat alternatives in almost all the descriptors Purdue University tracked, 42% of consumers said beef alternatives were somewhat or much better from an animal welfare perspective, with 38% of people saying beef is much or somewhat better on animal welfare and 19% said both were similar.
“The biggest takeaway from our alternative meat questions is that consumers still overwhelmingly prefer beef from cattle across a wide range of product attributes. This result reinforces the fact that plant-based meat remains a niche product,” Joseph Balagtas, the CFDAS director and a professor of agricultural economics, shared in a press release.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta