Combining AI and CRISPR: Gene-edited hardwood trees increase carbon sink potential of deep forests
Combining AI and CRISPR: Gene-edited hardwood trees increase carbon sink potential of deep forests


Researchers are using the revolutionary gene-editing technology CRISPR to breed unique, pulp-abundant poplar trees that, as laid out in a study published [July 13], could lower the carbon footprint of paper products derived from the trees.
The trick is to grow poplars with lower levels of the substance lignin, a biopolymer that has stood in the way of cheaper large-scale production of wood fibers. In the new study, researchers used computer models to find the right chemical composition to accomplish that feat, including increasing the ratio of two “building blocks” that make up lignin as well as the carbohydrate-to-lignin ratio.
Finding the “sweet spot,” the researchers say, will yield trees with higher pulp production, which would in turn decrease the environmental impact of the products they’re turned into, like packaging and diapers.
It took 13 years for the team of half a dozen researchers to build the predictive model, which sorted through nearly 70,000 different gene-editing strategies. Large-scale machine learning models combined with CRISPR allowed the scientists to evaluate, test and process groups of poplar tree molecular structures for 21 different genes associated with tree fiber production.
…
With recent developments in artificial intelligence applications and data processing, [researcher Jack] Wang hopes this technology will have far-reaching applications in the fight to combat climate change.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta