Despite no evidence of health harm in humans, companies scramble to phase out synthetic dyes
Despite no evidence of health harm in humans, companies scramble to phase out synthetic dyes


On January 15, 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration revoked authorization of Red No. 3 in food, causing it to be phased out by the end of 2027. The agency pointed to a study that found, in high doses, Red No. 3 causes cancer in male rats. This invoked the Delaney Clause, prohibiting authorization by the FDA of a food or color additive if it has been found to induce cancer in humans or animals.
This happened despite the study noting that the mechanism that caused the cancer that is not present in humans and the levels of dosage were not relevant to the levels used in human food human consumption.
As the artificial-dye deadline approaches, companies are making announcements on whether they will be able to make or miss it. Although the push comes from the government, consumers are watching what the industry will do.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’
