Ethical concerns drive embrace of plant-based proteins
Ethical concerns drive embrace of plant-based proteins — but not cultivated meat


The ultimate success of cell-cultured meat depends on consumer acceptance. What factors are driving, or hindering, uptake?
Consumer studies indicated at least seven factors affecting consumer acceptance of cultured meat: public awareness, risk-benefit perception, ethical and environmental concerns, personal factors, product properties and availability of meat alternatives.
Concerning ethical and environmental concerns, some previous research has found that animal welfare plays a role in consumers’ reduced meat diet and acceptance of cultured meat. Others have suggested that animal welfare and ecological concerns were the most influential drivers of consumers’ attitudes towards cultured meat.
…
Environmental and ethical concerns stimulate a desire to preserve the environment and encourage consumers to accept more sustainable food production systems. However, it was surprising to learn that ethical and environmental concerns prompted consumers to be willing to pay a premium for purchasing meat substitute (e.g plant based substitutes, but not necessarily cultured meat… The results indicated that the environmental advantages alone do not seem to be a strong motivation to compensate for perceived risks (or disgust impulse) of this novel technology.”
– [Researcher] Ashkan Pakseresht.
Following ethical and environmental concerns the next most significant factors included public awareness and knowledge, and personal factors.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta