Fertilizers are critical for farming — but they are often environmentally costly. Synthetic biology may offer a solution
Fertilizers are critical for farming — but they are often environmentally costly. Synthetic biology may offer a solution


Almost everything about synthetic fertilizer sucks.
It sucks for the climate, generating 2.5 percent of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions, more than global aviation. It sucks for the environment, creating a dead zone the size of Connecticut in the Gulf of Mexico while choking the Great Lakes with algal blooms. And it sucks for farmers, because it’s an expensive commodity controlled by petro-giants like Koch Industries and petro-states like Russia — and about half its nitrogen gets wasted.
The world needs to find a more sustainable nitrogen delivery system, and a fast-growing Berkeley-based unicorn called Pivot Bio, backed by green investors like Bill Gates and Al Gore as well as unsentimental agribusinesses like Bayer, Bunge and Continental Grain, believes it’s invented one.
Pivot Bio sells genetically edited microbes designed to pull nitrogen out of the air and feed it to crops, while making sure the nitrogen actually fertilizes the crops instead of escaping to the environment. And farmers are buying them. Pivot’s biological replacements for chemical fertilizers were applied to more than 5 million acres of American farmland last year, producing more than $100 million in revenue for the company.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta