German Liberals break from Green Party, advocate for anti-biotechnology policy rethink as coalition totters
German Liberals break from Green Party, advocate for anti-biotechnology policy rethink as coalition totters


The Greens, a partner in Germany’s three-party coalition, must tear down internal walls to overcome the tug-of-war over genetic engineering that currently exists within the coalition, Carina Konrad, a member of parliament for the liberal coalition partner FDP, said ahead of an EU-level vote on the issue that could see Germany abstain.
The European Commission recently put forward a controversial proposal to deregulate new genomic techniques (NGTs) but parties in the German government have different views on deregulating gene-edited products, with the Greens being very vocal in its opposition.
If the German government fails to find an internal common position, it will likely abstain from voting at the EU level. Bickering between coalition partners has already led to voting abstentions by Germany in the past.
…
“We have been left behind in [plant] breeding for more than 20 or 25 years because Europe has closed its doors to the developments that have taken place worldwide in genetic engineering itself,” she stressed, adding that “we are threatened with the same fate [in terms of NGT] if we do not come to sensible decisions quickly.”
Therefore, the liberalisation of genetic engineering could prove to be the next friction point for the German government, which has often been embroiled in power struggles due to opposing views on many issues.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta