Glyphosate, the world’s most widely used herbicide, is the subject of widespread controversy in scientific literature, media, policy, and society. The debate revolves around its prominent role in modern agriculture for controlling arable weeds, despite its potential harmfulness and environmental impact. This article aims to assess the trade-offs associated with decreasing glyphosate use and explore the potential for alternative farming strategies using cultural control methods as part of their integrated weed management (IWM), [which] could facilitate a transition towards a glyphosate-free future.

Our study suggests that removing glyphosate from arable systems has significant implications. While it results in increased weed abundance, reduced crop yields, and lowered profits, it can also offer positive outcomes, such as reduced herbicide risk to the environment and increased arable plant diversity. Farmers who are considering alternative weed management strategies should carefully assess these options, considering both ecological and economic factors. The integration of simulation studies, empirical research, and a thorough understanding of weed ecology and biology will contribute to informed decision-making and sustainable agricultural practices.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here