Hyper-palatable food: Scientist who published the seminal study showing the dangers of all ultra-processed food backs away from his theory
Hyper-palatable food: Scientist who published the seminal study showing the dangers of all ultra-processed food backs away from his theory


In 2019, [nutrition and metabolism scientist at the National Institute of Health] Kevin Hall conducted a study that has been cited by researchers all over the world. It is mentioned in scores of newspaper articles and books. The study is presented as the ultimate proof that ultra-processing does something to the food, that it causes obesity and lifestyle diseases.
There are two reasons why Hall’s study is so widely discussed.
One is that it is considered a good study, properly conducted with clear results.
The second reason is that the study stands quite alone.
Moreover, it is a fact that ultra-processed foods can also be healthy, Hall said.
He referred to the lunches he himself eats. They contain lots of fibre, whole grains, and vegetables. But they are processed so that they are easy to heat up in the microwave.
Hall refuses to believe that these ultra-processed lunches are unhealthy.
If it’s just the processing that makes us eat more of the ultra-processed food, then this should also apply to healthy breakfast cereals and wholemeal bread in stores. No, there must be something more.
…
Kevin Hall is now about to start a new, similar study. The aim is to find out why people choose to eat more calories of ultra-processed food.
They will test out a newer definition of food: hyper-palatable food, which can be translated as hyper-enjoyable food.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta