Foods / Monday, 08-Sep-2025

The gut microbiome charges a ‘processing fee’ — and this impacts how the body modulates weight

The gut microbiome charges a ‘processing fee’ — and this impacts how the body modulates weight

XLinkedInFacebookRedditBlueskyThreads
Credit: Adobe Stock
Credit: Adobe Stock
Whether the source is carbohydrates, protein, or fat, a calorie is a calorie. New dietary math based on the microbiome says that a calorie may get eaten– not by us – but by our bacterial companions, altering the balance needed to reduce one’s weight.

Those delightful calories we swallow are broken down as we chew them up, further dissolved with acids in the stomach, which then releases them to our intestinal tract, where we absorb the nutrients and send the rest to our microbiome. The various taxonomic groups within the microbiome convert our leftovers into additional nutrients that we can absorb – the “payment” for their efforts is to eat the rest for themselves. New studies suggest that some of the microbiome charge more for their services than others. As a result, the composition of our microbiome can influence how readily we can lose weight.

Credit: Healthline

What constitutes obesity remains ill-defined. Characterizing the constituents of our microbiome, from a metabolic viewpoint, does not discriminate healthy overweight from any other presentation of weight excess, the phenotypes of obesity. Studies show that what we eat, say fiber, in the presence of some bacteria that find fiber their favorite food, will result in significant weight loss – there seems to be a metabolic signal for us to identify.

The researchers made use of participants in a commercial weight loss program. They identified 239 (out of 5,000) with available blood and stool samples for analysis. They stratified the group into those losing >1% of their bodyweight per month over six to 12 months and those who maintained their bodyweight – so the study involved 105 individuals. The ages of the groups and their glucose levels (a measure of diabetes) were the same at the start of the intervention. But the group that ultimately had weight loss had higher baseline weight and HDLs. The weight maintenance group was not quite as overweight at baseline; 50% were considered overweight or obese compared to 100% in the weight loss group.

  • Those with higher baseline BMI (weight) lost more weight than those with lower baseline BMI
  • The weight loss group showed “broad improvement” in biomarkers associated with inflammation and metabolic “derangements.” – losing weight made them metabolically healthier
  • None of the food frequency measures or baseline blood metabolites were associated with weight loss. Nor was the diversity of the microbiome.
  • But the presence of 31 functional genes derived from the microbiome was associated with weight loss. These genes were related to the breakdown of polysaccharides and proteins and responses to stress and respiration.
Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

But what does this mean?

The presence of some bacterial species competes more effectively for the polysaccharides we eat. They metabolize them first and give us back “lower energy-dense fermentation byproducts,” more specifically short-chain fatty acids that we believe reduce inflammation and provide fewer calories to us in the process. This reduction in energy and conversion into more beneficial byproducts is the payment I alluded to in the first paragraph.

There is increasing evidence that it is not just what we eat that determines whether we gain, lose or maintain our weight. The composition of our microbiome, as this study demonstrated, can exact a higher “processing fee” for its contribution, which will result in more beneficial, less caloric nutrients for us.

The study is preliminary; it is still searching for a stronger signal of what is going on. The sample size is small, and the results may be certain, but the meaning remains fuzzy. But it does suggest that understanding obesity involves more than how much we exercise and how many calories we ingest. As with everything in our nature, it is complex, and the parts act in relation to one another in ways we are just beginning to understand.

Dr. Charles Dinerstein, M.D., MBA, FACS is the Medical Director at the American Council on Science and Health. He has over 25 years of experience as a vascular surgeon. He completed his MBA with distinction in the George Washington University Healthcare MBA program and has served as a consultant to hospitals

A version of this article was originally posted at the American Council on Science and Health and has been reposted here with permission. The American Council on Science and Health can be found on Twitter @ACSHorg

combined disclaimer outlined@ x
donation plea outlined@ x
XLinkedInFacebookRedditBlueskyThreads
podcastsGLP Podcasts & Podcast VideosMore...
Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!

v facts and fallacies cameron and liza default featured image outlined

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...
science hand testtube x

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

Genetic Literacy Project
international law x

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

Genetic Literacy Project
two types of breeding x

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?

Genetic Literacy Project
Screen Shot at AM

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’

T H LO

IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer): Glyphosate cancer determination challenged by world consensus

Most Popular

  • Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health

  • Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains

  • Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?

  • Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics

  • California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining

  • 30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus

  • The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs

  • ‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta

Follow Us

Newsletter

Be the first to know about new products and promotions.

Subscribe with your email

Tranding

Tags

zolentz

Fresh, fast, and fun — all the entertainment you need in one place.

© Zolentz. All Rights Reserved. Designed by zolentz