Viewpoint: ‘Agriculture is the only carbon emitting sector with the potential to become a net emissions sink’
Viewpoint: ‘Agriculture is the only carbon emitting sector with the potential to become a net emissions sink’


Of the major emitting sectors, agriculture, forestry, and other land use (AFOLU) is currently the only one with serious potential to become a net emissions sink, meaning it can pull more greenhouse gases out of the atmosphere than it emits. This makes AFOLU pivotal to reaching net zero emissions.
To achieve a stable climate, we need to put more emphasis and resources toward transforming AFOLU from a net source of emissions to a net sink—the kind of focus that is making transformative change achievable in sectors like power generation and transport.
Three examples provide a sense of the possibilities. Solar energy now enables low-cost electrification almost anywhere with big implications for irrigation, cold storage and food processing; bio-innovations, such as the Nobel prize-winning CRISPR-CAS gene editing technologies, hold tremendous promise; and digital innovations are now rapidly permeating the developing world.
Overall, positive innovation perspectives along with a solid track record of high returns to research and development investments in AFOLU indicate that a major innovation push in AFOLU and food systems has the potential to meet the ambitious sequestration goals that are implicit in a pledge for net-zero emissions globally, while also improving livelihoods, human nutrition, and the environment.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta