Viewpoint: ‘Anti-technology activists unfairly malign genetically modified mustard crop that could drop pesticide use by 40%’
Viewpoint: ‘Anti-technology activists unfairly malign genetically modified mustard crop that could drop pesticide use by 40%’


The polarised debate over genetically modified (GM) crops in India is back in the limelight. The advocates and dissenters of GM technology broke open the debate following the Supreme Court’s refusal to allow the environmental release of genetically modified (GM) mustard. This indefinite moratorium to halt all field trials of GM mustard has not only inflicted a severe blow to an array of crops which are in various stages of trials that employ transgenic technology, but has also dampened the hopes of GM mustard, Brassica juncea, in becoming India’s first GM food to reach the kitchen.
For instance, since the introduction of Bt cotton in 2002, there has been a remarkable increase in India’s cotton yield, leading to a significant rise in farmers’ income. In fact, more than 95 per cent of cotton growing areas of the country is planted with Bt cotton by an increasing number of cotton farmers, resulting in the savings of about 40 per cent of total chemical insecticides.
However, the anti-GM lobby persists in making false claims, one of which is linking Bt cotton to crop failures and mass suicides in India. Once GM mustard is introduced into Indian farms, there is no doubt that the anti-GM lobby will be poised to raise questions about its efficacy.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta