Foods / Tuesday, 09-Sep-2025

Viewpoint: Environmental activists, food elitists and trial lawyers profiterring on science disinformation put American farmers and U.S. agricultural policy at risk.

Viewpoint: Environmental activists, food elitists and trial lawyers profiterring on science disinformation put American farmers and U.S. agricultural policy at risk.

XLinkedInFacebookRedditBlueskyThreads
cc6e98dc-f312-40c0-a0a3-ad149507d355

Food elitists contend America’s farmers and ranchers have lost their way. They want to overturn the system for food production that has been the bedrock of this great country for more than two centuries. Doing so would be dangerous, jeopardizing our access to nutritious, abundant, and affordable food, as Europe and others who have pursued poor approaches not supported by sound science and economics now know.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins recently assured farmers she would support them and make certain that efforts to make Americans healthy would not compromise the farming practices which have made us the envy of the world. I have full confidence in President Donald Trump and Secretary Rollins to support American farmers.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Farm families have faced droughts and floods and every imaginable pest while constantly improving productivity and protecting our planet. We have leveraged our land grant universities, private sector partners, and USDA researchers to unleash innovation, from seed and animal genetics to crop-care products. Today’s modern equipment and computerization are all tools we use to preserve and restore our natural resources.

Yet critics of American agriculture are spreading half-truths and outright lies. They claim we poison the Earth and the food we raise. That is an insult—and attack—on everyone who works the land and the extensive independent research supporting sound practices. Today we use significantly less fertilizer, pesticides, fuel, and labor than at any time in our history. In doing so, we have increased productivity and fed growing populations here and abroad while protecting our planet.

Unfortunately, these critics are gaining credibility with some segments of the public and within the political establishment. A video [by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.] filmed [last fall] in front of USDA offices in Washington, D.C.—and [still] circulating widely on social media—calling for reversing decades of progress and agriculture policies should be a warning call for anyone who cares about agriculture.

[RFK. Jr. and like-minded] critics talk about how to “Make America Healthy Again.” But they offer only one idea—a politicized and restrictive interpretation of regenerative farming. Their version of farming opposes innovation and productivity, claiming it will preserve and protect the land.

Their approach has been tried around the world, with experiments put into practice in Africa, Asia, and other places. The results are rising food prices, unsafe food, and the deterioration of our environment.

The same idea was at the heart of the “Farm to Fork” program in Europe a few years ago and similar mandated practices in Sri Lanka. The European Union (EU) program and policy shifts in Sri Lanka were not based on science, led to complicated regulations, and proved unworkable. Farmers across the continent protested. Just in the past few weeks, the Europeans decided to scrap Farm to Fork. The outcomes in Sri Lanka were worse with food insecurity that led to civil violence and the fall of their government.

Responsible regenerative practices are continually incorporated into modern farming techniques supported by science and sound economics. Yet the food elitists and those who seek to profiteer from misinformation continue to contend that American agriculture needs a radical “off ramp” from our current production system, as if science—and common concern for feeding all of humanity—should be set aside.

Make no mistake, this attack on farmers and ranchers and their access to innovations is not about the safety of our food or public health. It only benefits unethical marketers who profit from public fears about food. And it is also about putting billions of dollars in the pockets of trial attorneys suing private-sector partners of American agriculture.

Kip Tom is a seventh generation Indiana farmer who served as the United States ambassador to the United Nations Agencies for Food and Agriculture, and chief of the United States Mission to the U.N. Agencies in Rome from 2019-2021. He co-chaired Farmers and Ranchers for Trump in the 2024 presidential election.

View original post here

combined disclaimer outlined@ x
donation plea outlined@ x
XLinkedInFacebookRedditBlueskyThreads
podcastsGLP Podcasts & Podcast VideosMore...
Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!

v facts and fallacies cameron and liza default featured image outlined

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...
science hand testtube x

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

Genetic Literacy Project
international law x

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

Genetic Literacy Project
two types of breeding x

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?

Genetic Literacy Project
Screen Shot at AM

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’

T H LO

IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer): Glyphosate cancer determination challenged by world consensus

Most Popular

  • microdosingA single high dose of LSD can ease anxiety and depression for months

  • From plastic coasters to human hearts: Inside the race to print the human body

  • CRISPR pork: U.S. approves first gene-edited pigs for consumption

  • ‘SuperAgers’: Why some people have the brains and memory capacity of people decades younger 

  • Baby food panic, brought to you by trial lawyers hoping to prosecute by press release

  • Viewpoint: Life and death decisions: RFK, Jr.’s shady FDA “expert panels” operate in secret with no transcripts or conflict of interest reviews

  • From ‘Frankenfood’ to superfood: Can the purple tomato overcome GMO myths to win over consumers?

  • When farmers deny science: The hypocrisy hurting agriculture’s credibility

Follow Us

Newsletter

Be the first to know about new products and promotions.

Subscribe with your email

Tranding

Tags

zolentz

Fresh, fast, and fun — all the entertainment you need in one place.

© Zolentz. All Rights Reserved. Designed by zolentz