Viewpoint: How European activists’ opposition to cutting edge crop technologies undermines global sustainability efforts
Viewpoint: How European activists’ opposition to cutting edge crop technologies undermines global sustainability efforts


Well-funded non-governmental organizations (NGOs) — both in the EU and the U.S. — regularly pour millions of dollars into lobbying African nations into adopting policies that reject modern agriculture. They call it “agroecology,” focusing on promoting “culturally sensitive” practices that glorify subsistence farming.
Meanwhile, farmers’ concerns have fallen on deaf ears. Experts warn that yields will be reduced by 30 to 40 percent due to insects and disease resulting in a smaller and more expensive food supply. As with any other area, African farmers face certain pressures that these activists don’t find in the U.S. or EU, especially given the tropical climate. Farms just aren’t one-size-fits-all.
Unfortunately, African farmers don’t have anyone on their side. Even the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization has assisted these NGOs by convincing government officials of these ridiculous and baseless lies. Among the most egregious: that GMOs cause cancer and pesticides make men infertile.
It’s an incredibly frustrating situation. While farmers in the U.S. are making gains on sustainability goals, the rest of the world is plunged in a black hole by these activist organizations. How can we possibly make work to solve tomorrow’s problems when we can’t even have conversations based on the truth?
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta