Viewpoint: ‘So-called environmentalists can eat crow, transgenic corn proves a win for science and the public’
Viewpoint: ‘So-called environmentalists can eat crow, transgenic corn proves a win for science and the public’


The reason was science; the corn had been genetically engineered to be shorter. That meant it needed less water, and resulted in less environmental strain, plus shorter stalks meant less risk from wind.
Over the protestations of environmentalists, USDA has already approved this transgenic corn, the final round of field trials happened this growing season on 12,000 hectares. Yet environmentalists should not protest at all. Corn is a grass, it was only ever genetically engineered to make cows grow better – it was poisonous to humans in its natural form. Add water to a poison grass and process it and you create food. Only later did humans then engineer it for direct human consumption also and then want to make it bigger and bigger to use less space. Now science is reversing that last part, by making it smaller but producing the same amount of food.

It is a win for the public, for science, and for farmers. The only losers are activist groups who hate science – and other horror movie scriptwriters. You can’t get lost in short corn fields, after all.
Hank Campbell is the founder and editor of Science 2.0. Hank is also the author of Science Left Behind. Follow Hank on X @HankCampbell
A version of this article was originally posted at Science 2.0 and has been reposted here with permission. Any reposting should credit the original author and provide links to both the GLP and the original article. Find Science 2.0 on X @science_2.0

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta