Viewpoint: Two independent Vermont agencies determined there is no scientific basis in banning neonicotinoid pesticides to ‘save honeybees’ while some advocacy ‘environmental’ groups
Viewpoint: Two independent Vermont agencies determined there is no scientific basis in banning neonicotinoid pesticides to ‘save honeybees’ while some advocacy ‘environmental’ groups contend otherwise. It’s now in the governor’s hands to decide if naked ideology will prevail


It is now up to Vermont Governor Phil Scott to stop this “pollinator protection bill”, which will actually do the opposite. Politicization of science doesn’t need evidence-based thinking so Vermont Democrats are claiming corn – Vermont’s largest vegetable crop – is a threat to bees.
Except scientists have told them repeatedly corn is pollinated by wind. It is not a food source for bees, any contact with bees is incidental and since neonicotinoids are seed treatments, not mass spray chemicals like organic-certified copper sulfate, they can’t be harmful to any pest that isn’t trying to eat them when plants are tiny. Which means not bees.
Neonicotinoids were specifically derived from natural pest protection to be safer for plants, animals, and the environment. Vermont’s neonicotinoid ban would force farmers to rely on older and much more environmentally harsh pyrethroid and organophosphate insecticides to protect their crops. One pound of neonicotinoids safely replaces so much old goop that reverting back would require a toxic chemical increase of 375%.
That is why Vermont scientists, farmer, and regulatory agencies say the ban would do far more harm and achieve no good.
Bees themselves agree. While beehives are up worldwide by 26% in just the last 10 years, Vermont has far surpassed that using ‘neonics’ – their bees are up 43%. Tests for chemicals in hives find neonics are barely present at all, while actual bee killers such as thymol and a 1950s organophosphate insecticide like organic coumaphos are far more prevalent.
The top three killers of bees are varroa mites, varroa mites, and varroa mites. Unless a bee falls into a vat of neonics and drowns, they are not dying from corn chemicals.
Vermont loves to claim it shows leadership by putting warning labels on things like GMOs, but denial of science is not the leadership that Governor Scott should enable.
Hank Campbell is founder of Science 2.0 and author of Science Left Behind. Follow Hank on X @HankCampbell
A version of this article was originally posted at Science 2.0 and is reposted here with permission. Any reposting should credit both the GLP and original article. Find Science 2.0 on X @science2_0

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’
