Viewpoint: Why do some people readily believe climate scientists but reject the view of crop geneticists? Austrian survey provides some clues
Viewpoint: Why do some people readily believe climate scientists but reject the view of crop geneticists? Austrian survey provides some clues


Fortunately, vaccine and climate skeptics prefer to hang out on social media, but not – at least at the moment – in government offices. Deriving sensitive policy from the state of research is difficult enough. To doubt this without justification would be the end of rational action.
…
This characteristic is particularly relevant at the moment. The European Union wants to relax the rules for genetically modified plants that have been processed using a new method. These “New Genomic Techniques” (NGT) change plants in the same way as conventional breeding – only faster. In other words, it is virtually impossible to prove how the plant was genetically modified, and it doesn’t matter.
No fewer than 34 Nobel Prize winners and another 1,000 scientists have written an open letter to reject “the darkness of anti-scientific fear-mongering” that seeks to place obstacles in the way of this technology. Among the signatories are the inventors of the famous “CRISPR” method, the so-called gene scissors. The experts agree that the risks of NGT plants are negligible – similar to vaccine damage caused by the corona vaccination.
Nevertheless, genetic engineering skepticism persists, especially in Austria, including in parties and NGOs that are not affected by scientific skepticism when it comes to climate or Corona.
The scaremongering is having an effect. According to a survey commissioned by the trade association and the environmental protection organization Global 2000, 94 percent of the Austrian population continue to demand labeling of the use of genetic engineering – even for indistinguishable products. 70 percent are against simpler and faster approvals.
[Editor’s note: This excerpt has been translated from German and edited for clarity.]
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta