Viewpoint: Why Italy’s cell-based meat ban is short sighted and alienates consumers
Viewpoint: Why Italy’s cell-based meat ban is short sighted and alienates consumers


Italian lawmakers banned cell-culture meat and blocked plant-based proteins from being labeled with meat terminology.
I suspect most animal ag people don’t really have a moral problem with ultraprocessed foods. They probably eat such foods regularly themselves and even feed them to their children. Every component of a peanut butter and jelly sandwich is ultraprocessed.
These critics’ real objection is that plant-based products threaten livestock farmers’ market share.
So far, cell-culture and plant-based products have not provided much of a threat.
…
In backing a ban on cell-culture meat, Italian farmers have indulged farmers in exactly this kind of anticompetitive practice — constraining food choice.
…
Livestock production need not be sacrificed on the altar of modernity. But spreading unscientific fears about cell-culture and plant-based products is no more ethical than touting baseless fears about GMOs.
The competition between meat and imitation meat should not be decided by stifling innovation and outlawing non-hazardous products.
The meat industry should win in the marketplace by selling foods people know and enjoy, that meet their ethical expectations, that support convenience and nutrition and cultural relevance.
Trying to ban the competition will endear animal ag to just about no one, especially those people who actually want to eat plant-based products.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta