For over 25 years, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) has released its so-called “dirty dozen” list, which inaccurately disparages popular, affordable and more accessible fruits and vegetables.

Peer reviewed science has repeatedly shown that the “dirty dozen” list is not scientifically credible, nor does the methodology used by EWG follow any established scientific procedures. Why do you continue to release a list that is not based on sound science?

Peer reviewed science has shown that your recommendation to substitute organic forms of produce for conventional does not reduce risk for consumers because residues are so low on conventional produce, if present at all. In fact EWG, you clearly state this list does not address risk.

From your report:

The Shopper’s Guide does not incorporate risk assessment into the calculations. All pesticides are weighted equally, and we do not factor in the levels deemed acceptable by the EPA.

Government sampling programs also repeatedly show that residues do not pose a safety concern.

…

Final question for EWG – Why not join health experts everywhere who agree that produce is the only food group they recommend we eat more of in our diets for better health – organic, conventional, local, home-grown – whatever consumers prefer?

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here.