Glyphosate has become a scapegoat in a broader campaign against modern production practices. Activists have cherry picked data, amplified worst-case scenarios, and ignored the generations of farmers who’ve safely and responsibly used this tool. 

Are there risks? Of course. That’s why we have labels and training and safety standards. But let’s not confuse precaution with prohibition. The conversation around glyphosate reflects a deeper divide between people who understand food production and those who only consume it. Many in our country have the luxury of being disconnected from the land. They don’t know what it takes to grow a healthy, affordable, and sustainable crop.

We need to show policymakers, consumers, and even our neighbors that glyphosate is not the enemy. It’s a tool, just like a no-till drill or a crop rotation plan. When used properly, it helps us protect the soil, conserve resources, and grow the food this country relies on.

Glyphosate may be in the crosshairs, but so is the future of practical, sustainable agriculture. Let’s not lose sight of what really matters.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here