Why gene editing could slingshot cell-based meat to economic viability
Why gene editing could slingshot cell-based meat to economic viability


A shocking report from the University of California, Berkeley suggests that cultivated meat could reduce emissions by 96 percent. However, currently, the biggest challenge with cultivated or lab-grown meat is that it’s so expensive that most people can’t afford it.
A new study from Tufts University researchers reveals an interesting solution to this problem.
However, the price for just one gram of a growth factor can range from a few hundred dollars to millions, depending on the type, and they are manufactured and sold by big industrial suppliers.
“Growth factors contribute to a majority of the cost of production for cultivated meat (up to or above 90%). Since they don’t last long in the cell culture media, they also have to be replenished every few days. This limits the ability to provide an affordable product to consumers,” the researchers note.
The researchers from Tufts University modified bovine muscle cells such that the cells were able to produce fibroblast growth factors (FGF) on their own, eliminating the need to purchase growth factors from external sources.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

![]() | Videos | More... |

Video: Nuclear energy will destroy us? Global warming is an existential threat? Chemicals are massacring bees? Donate to the Green Industrial Complex!
![]() | Bees & Pollinators | More... |

GLP podcast: Science journalism is a mess. Here’s how to fix it

Mosquito massacre: Can we safely tackle malaria with a CRISPR gene drive?

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’
![]() | Infographics | More... |

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer
![]() | GMO FAQs | More... |

Why is there controversy over GMO foods but not GMO drugs?

How are GMOs labeled around the world?

How does genetic engineering differ from conventional breeding?
![]() | GLP Profiles | More... |

Alex Jones: Right-wing conspiracy theorist stokes fear of GMOs, pesticides to sell ‘health supplements’








Viewpoint — Fact checking MAHA mythmakers: How wellness influencers and RFK, Jr. undermine American science and health
Viewpoint: Video — Big Solar is gobbling up productive agricultural land and hurting farmers yet providing little energy or sustainabilty gains
Fighting deforestation with CO2: Biotechnology breakthrough creates sustainable palm oil alternative for cosmetics
Trust issues: What happens when therapists use ChatGPT?
30-year-old tomato line shows genetic resistance to devastating virus
California, Washington, Oregon forge immunization alliance to safeguard vaccine access against federal undermining
The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs
‘You have to treat the brain first’: Rethinking chronic pain with Sanjay Gupta